Fossils also exist in the present

Carbon dating method definition not found

When molten lava solidifies, it has some Potassium in it. Neither does the fossil record disprove either evolution or creation. In many places in the world, you can find stratified layers of rock in which are embedded various fossils. They found tools in the vicinity of the bones, and assumed that Australopithicus used them.

There also exist and have existed various species of apes, some extinct, and some still living. Evolution requires that the gene pool be expanded to allow for more variations to occur. The fish are naturally to be found at the bottom because they dwelt in the lowest elevations, in ponds, lakes, and rivers. Life on earth is an example of incredible order and complexity.

Evolutionists cite all sorts of alleged examples of beneficial mutations. The fossil record of life forms The fossils themselves don't have dates attached to them. It is the tail that we see as a result. But never has anyone demonstrated that a mutation has benefitted an organism in such as way as to create an innovative function or a more complex or different kind of life form. One of the requirements for validation of a scientific hypothesis is that it be subject to falsification.

Limited information is availableThis makes such scenarios to

If data is found which contradict the hypothesis, then this contradictory data must be accepted and considered, along with the data that supports the hypothesis. Discoveries of various bone fragments and skeletal parts continued by several others. The formation of living matter from non-living matter by chance remains within the realm of speculation without foundation.

It is assumed that there was no exchange of either Potassium or Argon between the specimen or its environment since it solidified. It is assumed that the level of atmospheric Carbon has been constant for tens of thousands of years, when it has only been measured since the early part of this century. Yet it is said that life originated in the oceans some billion years ago. Woodward reported the discovery of an ape-man in Kent Plateau in England.

So Carbon dating is irrelevant to the discussion of the time frame of macro-evolution, which is supposed to have occurred over hundreds of millions of years. They have never been observed to create more complex or functionally different kinds of life forms.

Even if uniformitarianists don't accept the historical record, they have no scientific basis for assuming that a worldwide catastrophe has not ever occurred. And the fossils that don't exist prove nothing. Each time a comet swings around close to the sun, the sun causes part of the comet to disintegrate. With the industrial age, pollution killed the lichen on the trees, making them dark.

Adam, Eve, and their descendants Homo sapiens The Genesis account gives us reliable historical information about the first men. The fact of the matter is that I am too clumsy and lack the skill and ability to cause a coin that I flip into the air to come down in any particular way. Rocks known to be less than a couple hundred years old have been dated at billions of years old. Neither will ever satisfy the other or a discerning observer. This idea would be considered an absurd proposition.

Limited information is available regarding these latter finds. This makes such scenarios to be at least as unlikely. Charles Darwin actually represented the fossil evidence as being a hostile witness to his theory, as documented in his famous book The Origin of Species.

Such events are not considered natural phenomena, and so by definition fall outside the realm of scientific inquiry. Finally, keep in mind that age does not imply ancestry. Many assumptions are made about decay rates, initial conditions, environmental influences, and etc. And lo and behold, the computers have actually gotten better and more sophisticated. Lead-Lead Similar principles and problems as shown above.